Jeremy Irwin said in an interview with Jeannine Pirro that on his list of suspects to have kidnapped his child was a “woman cheating on her husb…” before Deborah shook her head “no,” signaling him to stop talking?
******************************************************************************
Deborah Bradley Continues to be the main “suspect” in the search for missing 1 year old baby Lisa Irwin.
To sum it up, Jeremy was at work the evening of baby Lisa’s disappearance. He is not usually away from the house at night. Apparently, Deborah put a coughing baby Lisa to bed around 10:30 after changing her clothes (she was changed into an outfit, not pajamas).
*******************************************************************************
*******************************************************************************
Though Lisa was sick with a cold or virus, Deborah slept in her own room with one of her two sons and the door shut. She also left the ‘computer room’ window open – and doesn’t remember if she locked the door.
*******************************************************************************
*******************************************************************************
Typically a concerned mother of three locks the door when the husband is away.
Deborah says she had a baby monitor on all night, but awoke to Lisa missing from her room – and police say there are no signs of forced entry.
Apparently, the intruder also happened to steal all the cell phones in the home, which is why the parents didn’t call 911 right away – even though Jeremy had a working phone he used for work.
He did eventually use that phone to call for help.
There has been speculation that Deborah was cheating on Jeremy that night (Keep reading for explanation).
The window the parents believe to be the point of entry was extremely loud and difficult to manage, according to a police reenactment. And the screen was put back into its place, an unliekly move made by an intruder.
So what happened to baby Lisa? In my analysis, I first noticed that Deborah does not have the eyes of a killer.
She appears to me a very needy, manipulative and controlling woman. She talks before she thinks, but has a knack for recovering inconsistencies and making sense of her stories.
She is a “good liar.” She seems to include genuineness with her lies in her attempts to “cover up” the disappearance of Lisa, if she, in fact, is responsible.
I believe Deborah has hired — or asked — someone to take baby Lisa in an effort to gain her husband’s affection. Here’s why:
In an interview with AP, Jeremy said of their beloved missing baby girl: “We need her. We have to have her. She’s our link that ties everybody together.”
What’s odd here? The child is needed because she “ties everyone together.” That indicates that they were, at some point, “untied” or broken as a family unit. Lisa was born and is the reason for Jeremy and Deborah’s surviving relationship. Deborah, who is married to another man she separated from 4 years ago, and Jeremy are engaged. It is unknown when they became engaged.
Deborah’s crying spells on her stiff boyfriend’s chest, her attempts to appear weak but strong and her defensiveness all point to a very needy woman.
Her boyfriend’s words may have revealed more than he realized. And it wouldn’t be the first time.
Store surveillance video taken the day Lisa went missing was recorded around 5 p.m., showing Deborah entering the local Festival Food store with a young man. “I’ve seen the video and the baby’s mother [Deborah Bradley] was seen with an unidentified man buying a box of wine. She did not buy paper plates or napkins,” the manager said. “The time she [Debbie] came in was 5 p.m. the day the baby went missing. The two definitely came in together and purchased the items. The man looked younger, to me he looked like he was around 20,” the manager said. Asked if the man and Debbi were walking as friends or if they appeared to be involved in a relationship, the manager said they were just walking together. “They weren’t hugging or holding hands or anything like that,” he said. “But they definitely came in together and left together.”
The way Deborah conducts herself indicates to me that she likely had the child removed to gain her boyfriend’s “unity.” It was her way of perhaps re-tying an “untied” relationship because of her unfaithfulness, or some other reason.
Deborah has stated that she understands the suspicion against her from police: “You see stuff like this everywhere. You watch the TV, and there’s some crazy person doing something insane. There’s been too many times stuff has happened,” she said. “They have to assume what’s worst … but it felt like it was taken really, really far.”
Is she over-stating how “insane” some “crazy” people are? Perhaps in her mind, she removed the child to ‘save’ her family, without harming the baby. She may even intend to have the baby safely returned by the person who removed her from the home after a certain amount of time has gone by – or after she achieves the affection and love from her boyfriend that she’s looking for.
The clock is ticking, and police have no leads. It’s only a matter of time before Deborah is arrested, which she herself has admitted to be an inevitable event.
