We at www.lobbyistsofficesofgrw.com say that a change in a version of major detail is what most people believe to be deceptive.
Memory is like a parade going past our eyes and is stored in our minds for easy recall.
Jeremy Irwin refuses to be interviewed by police alone. His confidence in refusing is in the face of public backlash of a father of a missing child not cooperating with police is telling.
This comes from not being polygraphed and being at work (alibi) when Lisa was killed.
He cannot take a polygraph now because questions will be focused on his story of when he got home.
Jeremy Irwin is deceptive in this statement.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0Lmy0Q5U_k&feature=related
Note where the pronouns drop, in particular, as he removes himself from his own statement. Note something else, plain to the untrained eye, about Jeremy Irwin.
Jeremy now has to keep track of deceptive statements including how he reports things were when he first got home:
He checked on the two boys first?
Where did he say that they were? In their room? With Deborah?
This highlights his need to be interviewed with Deborah so that they can keep track of the changing story and allow her to interrupt him and ‘correct’ his story…along with Joe Tacopina, who will now need to reinterview both parents and come up with a single story which will be something different than anything else we have heard as he circles the wagons around the lying duo.
Jeremy is conspiring with Deborah and will be charged along with her.
It has an almost surreal feel to this, like the nutty Casey Anthony ‘kidnapping’ saga all over again.
We are listening to a fake story of kidnapping with a pushy attorney who refuses to acknowledge the bizzarre or extreme, and a media which bends over backwards to appear to not judge. Few professionals are willing to say “I have investigated crimes for twenty years: these two are lying!”
Why not?
Are we really to believe that “former FBI” so and so, with “two decades experience in kidnapping” can’t or won’t discern what amateurs across the country can in the lies of the parents?
That therapists or analysts with years of experience can’t see through a low intellect lie?
That police commentators only have “questions” about the implausible story of a kidnapper picking just the right house, on just the right night, and on the only night of a dog’s life where she doesn’t bark?
Why is it taboo for HLN hosts to “judge” Deborah Bradley, but didn’t mind tattooing Casey Anthony with the title of liar?
In a moment of emotional clarity, Nancy Grace showed anger that Deborah Bradley got her hair done. Is this just a catty, judgmental moment of pettiness?
No, it isn’t.
A baby is missing.
A mother who has a baby missing (like a father) cannot eat, sleep, or think about anything but her missing child. Going out to get her hair done, like Casey Anthony going to get a tattoo, is, in deed, telling.
How far must some go to say “grieving” does not mean “grieving” here, even though in context: a child is missing, a mother is lying, the story changes, parents reference the child in past tense; something we do about the dead, and a cadaver dog finds human decomposition in the very room Jeremy and Deborah said “do not check!” in and defense attorneys on HLN expect us to take them seriously when they say “she is grieving” over something else? Or, she is too stupid to know what grieving means; she is just echoing Joe Tacopina…are we to take them seriously?
What’s happened to reporting on crime?
On a brighter side, we saw the emergence of Kathi Belich from WFTV and a local reporter from KC is asking questions without theatrics. Isabelle Zhender is doing a great job for those of us who care about justice for Baby Lisa. She has now answered an important question I have had since the beginning:
That Jeremy Irwin has refused, while his daughter is missing, to be interviewed outside the presence of Deborah Bradley is not only an indication that he has conspired with her to conceal information about his daughter, reporters should be asking straight questions and highlighting illogical responses.
When Megan Wright says that she does not know who answered her phone, how difficult would it have been to ask, “did it go to voice mail?” along with a few other common sense questions.
When Aunti said, “police need to pin it on someone”, meets Joe Taco, and then says, “it was taken out of context”, where was the question, “What context was it in?”
Jeremy Irwin cut short the questions of police because he was tired while his daughter was missing; a most unmanly excuse.
Where were the follow up questions? Where is the commentary?
Jeremy Irwin refuses to be interviewed alone because his story has also changed.
We stand by our analysis of the statements:
1. Deborah Bradley has been deceptive about what happened to Lisa; 2. Jeremy Irwin has been deceptive about when he got home and what he knows, and is concealing from police what he knows; 3. Parents have given linguistic indicators that Lisa is dead. 4. There never was a kidnapping 5. Lisa Irwin died at or shortly after 10:30PM, at the hands of her mother, likely in a fit of anger, shaken or dropped, while disrupting Bradley’s “adult time” 6. Lawyers and PI have promoted a questionable ‘reward’ $ for anyone who “brings her right here”, which they know will never happen.
